CO129-488 - Governor Sir Stubbs - 1925 [1-7] — Page 234

223

nanofi

VASZI „AJTI dexam

KTM LOGOLBI100 40

•

to Bf.oll redjaj

at beatadooo æedurim snowywadum wild bra (SKI „dere

get dia quoy unożał of wonor! ødt evad 1 „GSyCada ali to jail asia minigo walionasen at sidans ma I Shut ye tindur qiluttonyası bas „Isumseti Lakrofch avant de vettes ont no amely

.I

DovodábamoƐ sat yd taimpol dusver sit

odd youalleud ali zď fedulogys „lioruod aviduseză

5 10 amp-3Ɛ ett ni aoidism(uzerit otni szłupne od

N

an voldne.j yttaler am bedywing dresabi@<_@ ?? 'zulibut all no vision işsed ynied yalapsi odd to find moitasidavit an outstani dezit sit ni Jungwit

lobal ander v dove TI „ymudod end to „STUOO» all yłkrøv of proJikah me jem bi wolls evail

Matador yng thudue to jamoadade a'mwa T

wprosseden fertsilanos svad

.S

to rotoaria wild :ori anoidenziani şi

# anokeɔndan? dna özgəl Fikud Isinolóð duld ever dibul ponitular of isźnolóð útiw ruido."[100 nt beer ed ut Takot mi?" afrow and dazymðri að fəl a: I jatob ɔ8 mi

+

ד

rego pathures on 9W „Ne at TIS,^X «oidaluge¶

10

20 womenzadoch to adyison tour.

•

-** not. umulants.it Vitlimi&

.01

Sub-Accountants" in Colonial Audit Departmental Instructions

No.46, read in conjunction with Colonial Regulation No.219

leads me to believe that Officers in charge of stores are

in this category, and would therefore be under the general management and supervision of the Treasurer as the Chief

Accounting Officer of the Colony.

3.

From the tenor of the Treasurer's minute, he

appears to be under the apprehension that the responsibility for the accuracy of the stores rests with the Head of the

Department and the Auditor. With regard to the responsibil-

ity of the Auditor I entirely disagree in view of Colonial

Audit Department Instructions Nos.44 and 47, when read in conjunction with Colonial Regulation 220, and I would respectfully submit that the Auditor does not stand in the

same relation to the Government as the ordinary officials of the Colony and is precluded from undertaking Executive

or Administrative duties, except with the special

permission of the Secretary of State, and in this connection

I would refer you to Colonial Audit Departmental Instruction

No.11.

4.

With reference to the Hon: Treasurer's

remarks that he has certain duties with regard to the payment for and debiting value of stores, but not with the

actual keeping of stores, the question of the custody of

stores (other than stamps) has never been raised, my

contention being that the Officer in charge of the stores is a Sub-Accountant of the Treasurer, and would consequently

come under his general supervision, and if such supervision is not exercised, I fail to understand how the Treasurer can satisfy himself that an established system of accounting

is being maintained.

5.

.yadeweƐ Iskrolok

at issue:-

To summarise briefly the three main points

I. That the Treasurer as Chief Accounting Officer of

the